Where cleanup tools usually fail
Many tools can remove text, but the workflow falls apart when redraw, lettering, and QA all happen somewhere else. That is when chapter consistency starts leaking.
KOMA Studio is built for the reality of scanlation work: remove source text, preserve the art, and keep moving toward a finished release without context loss.
Cleanup is rarely the final problem. Teams need to remove source text, preserve the art, and keep the page ready for lettering and QA without creating downstream rework.
A useful cleanup tool does more than erase text. It has to preserve art quality and keep the page ready for lettering, redraw review, and final QA.
Many tools can remove text, but the workflow falls apart when redraw, lettering, and QA all happen somewhere else. That is when chapter consistency starts leaking.
KOMA positions cleaning and redraw as one stage inside the same chapter workspace used for translation and typesetting. That makes it easier to review every decision in context instead of rebuilding pages downstream.
KOMA is the better fit when text removal is only the beginning and the same page still needs redraw review, lettering, and final QA. The bigger the chapter workload, the more that continuity matters.
KOMA Studio is developed in the open under the MIT license. It runs on your own machine, keeps projects on your disk, and never gates a feature behind a paid tier. You bring the AI model — hosted or local — and everything else is yours to inspect, modify, and redistribute.